This would make Firefox use less memory than Chrome on all platforms. Closing Words You can run the tests by yourself, as the tools that Mozilla used to run the benchmarks are openly available. It needs to be noted that Google Chrome uses one content process per tab by default. More precisely, Mozilla ran the same test that it did last year with 2, 4 and 8 content processes. Firefox's memory usage would increase more if Mozilla would enable this as well.
Usage drops, responsiveness tops to normal :. It was like that for me on Windows, and still is on Linux. On two, Windows and Linux, it would use considerably less than Chrome. Judge by your own experiences. The new test conducted by Mozilla takes different content process configurations into account. Mozilla Firefox with its is still the web browser with the best memory performance according to Mozilla.
I just wish there was a possibility to automate it. That is why I went to Pale Moon and Chrome. If you use Firefox, check out our. Its feels so smooth and fast while Firefox hangs sometimes and open pages slow. Firefox uses more memory if more content processes are added, but the difference between 2 and 8 content processes is not as problematic as Mozilla assumed last year. I run Firefox without add-ons on my Linux desktop and run into the same problem. The difference is not as spectacular on Mac devices.
Tip: you can , and not tab. I guess an addon would be neccessary to monitor memory usage, prompt user that restart is immanent, save and restore session. Mozilla did run tests of its own last year, and this year with multi-process versions of the browser. My entire system also becomes less responsive over that time as well. The eight content process version used even more memory than Chrome on the operating system.
Just let it die already … eh! Mozilla's loaded 30 web pages of the Alexa top 100 in their own tabs, with 10 seconds in between loads, and looked at the memory usage of the browser in the end. Firefox with two and four content processes uses less memory than Chrome, but the difference is just 150 Megabyte at the most. This is particularly the case on Windows and Linux, where the memory use difference is significant. This works for other Chromium-based browsers as well including and. Most important thing is performance and Chrome is way of head of any browser out there.
They pick and choose the data that allows them to say their browser is the best. . So they are trying to do a quick sell on their floundering product. Mozilla estimated last year that , and more if more processes were used by the browser. It will be interesting to see memory usage comparison between Opera and Chrome though if you can do that Martin. On Linux, memory usage rose by just 125 Megabyte under the same eight content processes.
Now You: Do you care about your browser's memory use? It appears at least, that Firefox is still the most memory friendly user in 2017, and that the switch to the multi-process architecture has not changed that. Multi-process architecture separates the browser from content processes in Firefox. Our own memory benchmarks saw Firefox lead the pack in and when we compared the browser's memory usage against Chrome, Opera and Internet Explorer on Windows. Mozilla's plan is to increase the number of content processes to four in the near future. Vivaldi is a bit heavier. Mozilla is a company struggling to hold onto users they have offended with each and every big update.
. . . . . .